ebcp Banner

 < Back to conference program > 

  Can the medical industry  contribute to the on going training of the clinical cardiovascular perfusion team? Present and future.

Serge DANIEL,

Paris/France.


1- « In 1983 and updated in 1995 a retrospective study is carried out in the USA over a 500 000 CPB cases. It is reported that 20% of the incidents/accidents during CPB are linked to the products(pumps, oxygenators etc…) and 75% to human errors or mistakes… » by Marc KURUSZ 1983/95.

This retrospective study is far from being outdated. Its spirit and statistical values are still valid to day. However it triggers numerous questions as it relates to training and education of the clinical  perfusionist. Here are a just few…

-         What can we do collectively to prevent those incidents/accidents to happen?

-         How can we enforce and test at regular intervals the knowledge and skill levels of the Perfusionist to perform her or his function?

-         Have the prerequisite skills and education levels be thorougly defined for a potential candidate as Perfusionist? Does a complete job description exist?

-         When training is dispensed to the Perfusionist, should it be also to the other members of the clinical perfusion team?

-         Are the links between the perfusion medical industry and all the actors of education well established and strong enough?

-         Have we come to realize that too much of the perfusion medical industry money is spent on festive activities and too little on education.

-         Is there really a risk that the medical education sector be taken as hostage by financial or lucrative interests?

-         Can the perfusion medical industry become a true partnership or a consulting force for everything linked to the education of the clinical perfusionist?

      Etc…

2- How can the medical industry help? (This list is far from being exhaustive…)

-         Provide excellent, complete and readable instruction manuals. (They should be considered as the product and application training manuals).

-         Perform mandatory dry and wet product in-services or runs before moving to the clinical use of a given product or system.

-         Perform mandatory change over procedure of the product or system if applicable.

-         Perform mandatory risk analysis. What if?

                                    examples: Venous assist drainage with –P.

                                                   Use of certain drugs…

On this point of risk analysis, in light of the fact that more and more complexity is added to CPB with new plastic, new chemical, new drugs, new mechanical and electronic materials or devices we must motivate ourselves to carry out systematically a risk analysis on potential hazards incompatibilities, failure modes or any potential malfunctions that can lead to disasters...that may never happen but could happen.

-         Promote or emulate group training as opposed to individual training ( learn from others).

-         Spend money wisely by investing on more education programs for the clinical perfusion team.

      

3- How can the clinical perfusion team or the Perfusionist help? (This list is far from being exhaustive …)

-         Assure that the instruction manuals are fully read and understood.

-         Assure all the above #2(dry/wet run), #3(change over), #4(risk analysis)and  #5(group training) points are followed.

-         Create and favor an ad hoc atmosphere and cooperative forum to solve a new or nagging problem.

                        Examples from the past:

                                    1- Leaking effects of propofol on polycarbonate molded parts…

                                    2- Occurrence of high excursion transient pressure             across an oxygenator…

                                    3- Treatment or management of the highly activated cardiotomy aspirated blood…

                                    4- Low prime oxy design for adults?!.

 

4- Future desirable expectations for the on going education of the clinical perfusion team?
(
This list is far from being exhaustive…)

Those  desires , wishes wants or expectations may pave the way for our future. In this case when the word future is used it  means our collective future in this important field of education.

-         CPB does continue to be the preferred H&L support to open heart surgery

-         Develop self motivated individual capable of long term personal investment in training or education. (Self learning is an attitude that does require own’s time investment).

-         Develop a well Design bypass simulator…

-         Set up once a year at each cardiac center level a meeting with the entire clinical perfusion team for an update in cardiac perfusion.
 ( What have we learnt this year, what are still the holes or voids etc…)

-         Assess the area of opportunity and growth within the hospital for the Perfusionist and her or his expertise to be exercised in extra corporeal circulation:

Examples

° General AutoTransfusion

° Autologous platelet gel for plastic reconstructive surgery.

° New treatment or management of the highly  activated cardiotomy  aspirated            blood both for coronary and valvular cardiac  surgery. Etc…

-         Re-eavalute the relationship with the perfusion medical industry with clear set objectives:

° Education involvement and financing.

° Improvement of the  genuine attendance of perfusionist at medical meetings.

° Continue to improve the accuracy of patient data collection during CPB in order to     improve the quality of care. Etc…


CTSNet EBCP Search Feedback